|
The
decline of the Empire has been vastly overrated. Here we are
fighting questionable wars, still picking fights and enjoying
every moment. As French-Canadian writer-director Denys Arcand
slyly points out in his satirical The Decline of the American
Empire, we still live in an age of indulgence and hedonistic
pursuits. Sure, we feel like crap because of it but we're
loving (or pretending to love) every second of it.
The
set up is clever. The guys are at home cooking the meal and
the girls are at the gym working out. And what's everyone
talking about? Sex, of course. The first hour of the film
is devoted entirely to the subject offering frank views and
astute observations. It's crude, rude and honest. Sometimes
funny, sometimes kinky, frequently filled with sorrow, these
are people who think they know themselves when in fact they're
clueless to anyone's point of view but their own. Even more
striking is that they're all intellectuals conversing together.
They come from different aspects of the university's history
program either as tenured staff, teaching assistants or secretaries.
They're a Jeopardy Tournament of Champions waiting to happen
when it comes to trivia and ideas. Just don't challenge their
point of view.
Intellectual
commentary such as this runs the risk of outdating itself
in a hurry. But not so. Like it or not, our attitudes and
actions haven't changed all that much in the almost two decades
it's been since Decline was first released. On a whole we're
still a society looking for pleasure and personal gain. Enron,
Oval Office fellatio and other scandals have shown we can
at least acknowledge many of our shortcomings yet we continue
to pursue that which brings power and prestige over internal
happiness. Arcand's message might not be the happy, happy,
joy, joy we have come to expect from our movies but he does
shed some truth no matter how hard it might be to digest.
Decline
is a talkie that at times talks a little too much. Arcand
knows that his characters are smart and exploit that for everything
they're worth, even if it's at the sacrifice a little bit
of entertainment value for us non-intellectual types. Is it
because he thinks the lower common denominators don't have
a hope or because the intellectuals are the ones that need
some humbling? I'm not certain either way. But Arcand is smart
and he's a filmmaker intent more on challenging us than entertaining
us. That's fine, just as long as he doesn't attempt to adapt
all the monotone teachers I had over the years.
©Movie
Views; June 5, 2003
|
|
 |
| Denys
Arcand |
 |
|
Denys Arcand |
 |
| Dominique
Michel |
| Dorothee
Berryman |
| Louise
Portal |
|
Genevieve Rioux |
| Pierre
Curzi |
 |
| 1986 |
 |
| Canada |
 |
| 101
minutes |
| |
|