|
Normally
I dig what the Joel and Ethan have cooking. Teaming with the
ever lovable teddy bear known as Tom Hanks, The Ladykillers
should be guaranteed good cooking, right? I'm afraid not.
While there's some interesting things happening in the film,
it never fully comes together.
Hanks
plays Goldthwait Higginson Dorr, PhD. But you might mistake
him for the dashing younger brother of Colonel Sanders of
Kentucky Fried Chicken fame. Higginson is a smooth talking
southern gent of the old-fashioned variety posing as an academic
on sabbatical training a group of men to play ancient instruments.
He rents out a room from sharp-witted widowed senior Marva
Munson (Irma P. Hall). Dorr and the band take to her cellar
and start digging their way into the vault at a nearby casino.
Buy the soundtrack.
The
Ladykillers is meant to be a comedic spin on the heist film
that explores the mythology of Edgar Allan Poe in the context
of southern hospitality. The problem is, it's not all that
funny. In fact, the first word that comes to mind for me is
boring.
Hanks
has mastered the art of charm. With the occasional exception,
i.e.The Burbs, his innocent face and Barney Rubble
smile are enough to bring life to his many memorable characters.
However, his take on Dorr is downright irritating. His academically
infused 19th-century banter is at times humorous, but he seems
insistent on ending most every conversation with a wheezing
laugh reminiscent of Steve Urkle.
The
rest of the cast are a hodgepodge of caricatures. Gawain (Marlon
Wayans) is the inside man at the casino and the streetwise
antithesis to Marva's churchgoing gospel traditions. The General
(Tzi Ma) is the guy who says little but when he speaks his
words are supposed to be astounding. Garth Pancake (J.K. Simmons)
is the outcast with faulty bowels. Lump (Ryan Hurst) is the
punch-drunk Frankenstein muscle. When you put them
together you get a group that you've seen before where the
only originality comes from a distinctly Coen brothers quirkiness
that freely mixes myth in with new material.
The
Coens have made a name for themselves by building off of legends
and as such, their films seem to be appreciated most by those
who are well versed in literature. But in placing so much
on the references and
symbolism, they also run the risk of alienating their audience.
Their most successful films have those references that make
the experience all the more richer for those who 'get it'
but their also accessible enough for those who might not be
in on their inside jokes. Fargo was funny and smart
even if you hadn't studied Paul Bunyan. O Brother, Where
Art Thou? was great even if you didn't see that it was
Homer's Odyssey thrown into the Depression era. The
Ladykillers seems to be playing with morality and Edgar
Allan Poe, but I'm not in the know I guess. And rather than
being otherwise rich, I had to stick to the surface and the
surface isn't too great.
If
the Coen brothers officially arrived with Fargo, the commercial
success of O Brother, particularly the soundtrack, brought
them ever closer to the mainstream. The Ladykillers
felt to me like Hollywood execs are trying to get the Coen
brothers to cash in on formulas that have proven profitable
rather than letting them play and try out new things. The
music here stands out, putting southern gospel on the pedestal
rather than traditional blue grass. While it is enjoyable,
there isn't the personality in the music that worked so well
with O Brother. Rather than complimenting and weaving through
the narrative, it sticks out and not in a good way. Toss in
the name power of Hanks and the film all of a sudden reeks
as a cash grab.
The
Ladykillers, a remake of a 1955 film starring Alec Guiness,
ultimately feels like someone trying to imitate the Coen brothers
rather than the Coen brothers doing something themselves.
While it scrapes the surface of being whimsical, it doesn't
come close to the magic created by past Coen flicks.
©Movie
Views; April 8, 2004
|